Do people not understand the concept of wishful thinking?
Do people not understand the concept of wishful thinking?
We’re just going to amble along till we lose five or six in a row and then bin him. Covid put paid to that. He wouldn’t have seen May without the game going into lockdown. I think we need to take a bold decision and move quick. You’ve got Lam unsigned for next year, Warrington fans turning on Price and Hull made a play for Watson. I think we face seeing Watson going to Wigan or Wire in the next year or so, do we really fancy that while we bore everyone to sleep?
St Helens Rugby League Football Club
Millward was a gamble wasn't he? But I saw some of the finest rugby I've seen under him the one negative was his option to throw certain games as he thought no team could go through the season unbeaten. Although JH did the same against London.
Woolfe should have played the First team on Monday and tied up the hub cap instead of thinking we were going to blast Wigan.
On the Back foot looking for the front one.
He could be another Powell Stiddy of course he could. However when Rowley was available he went and got him. What this tells me he is prepared to work alongside a potential threat to his job and do the best for his club.
My point earlier is do we keep going overseas? If it works ALA Holbrook they cant wait to get back, if it doesn't ALA Royce you are stuck with someone just here to fill their boots and get a severance. In the case of Watson or lets go left field Scully, you need to give them 3 years and if it is even going just pretty well stick with them. The beauty is they wont be looking elsewhere but Saints.
On balance, I'd let him have the second year, too.
With regards to not inheriting a great team, whilst it may not be comparable to one or two unbelievable teams of the past, it's easily the best team & squad in SL. Last season pretty much the same team smashed SL. He's taken us backwards, not just in terms of how good we are, but the playing style.
The thing is we have not been average for most of the season. Between rounds 5 and 10 we played brilliant rugby for most of that period who is responsible for that the coach, the players or both.
For me there was a shift after that in how the opposition worked out a plan to smother our attacking options, Tony Smith from Hull K R started the tactic of targeting our pivots and Walmsley with an extra workload and then quite a few other teams went down the same plan. We couldn't find a counter plan and got drawn into a middles game from then on.
My major worry is that he still doesn't know his best side. Welsby is moved around carte blanche, he gives Simm's enough games to get comfortable and used to the league and then drops him, Lomax and Fages are seemingly untouchable even though he has been shouting about how ready Dodd has been all season, then we he does play he shifts him to Hooker. Smith looked to be coming on leaps and bounds and was doing better than Roby in some matches, but he has barely been seen post-lockdown, and now Eaves is the back-up? We have strike players across the backs, but Naiqama only registered his 5th try of the season against Wigan?
It's not good enough, and the more I think about it, the less I want him to continue.
Well yes I agree but it really isn't down to one man, its players and coaches, Woolf knew he had a job to do and it was going to be much harder to defend a title than it is to win a title.
I still argue the point though that he inherited a great team, he inherited a knackered one with quite a few players gone past their prime this season. The only players who have played better this season is Walmsley and Makinson all the others are below par compared to last season and that is not all down to tactics.
Woolf got criticised for using Welsby but Holbrook did exactly the same thing with Richardson in his first full season. I also don't think because we won at a canter last season we were going to do something similar, just doesn't happen these days just look at Castleford one season dominance a couple of seasons back.
In my opinion Woolf deserves a second season with fresh players and young players challenging for positions, then if we get the same outcomes then he is obviously gone.
The rest of the league lowered its standards last year but our 2019 record was W-26 L-4. Our record in 2018 was W-26 L-3, so we did actually replicate our dominance in 2018 in 2019. This was a team that ripped the league apart in Year 1 under Holbrook (and fell short against Wire) and then did exactly the same in Year 2, winning the GF. So I'm not convinced that a team that won 52 out of 59 regular season games in the last two seasons was ripe for a significant dip in 2020.
Not sure I buy this. He knows his best team and it wouldn't have either of Welsby or Simm in it, beacuse Percy would be playing centre and everyone including Woolf knows our best back 5.
He didn't "drop" Simm, we arrived back at a point where we had one space in the backs and he had to pick between Simm and Welsby and he picked Welsby.
He didn't "drop" Smith for Eaves - Smith wasn't available to play!
I'm all for constructive criticism but saying he doesn't know what team to play when he is forced into selections by injury is a bit daft.
Get your point Div. However we are 3 years down the line with basically the same squad and on Friday it did show, especially from the bench.
The culture of bottling big games has never really changed in the last 10 years. We get praised for a great accademy but I struggle to name one really mongrel forward we have produced since Jammer. With all due respect to Derek Traynor and Ian Talbot is that a gap in their preparation of young players?
Is it possible the league have raised its standard this year, my argument still stands that our players are not as good individuals this year. Seasons 2018 and 2019 we didn't have a lot of injuries, this year we have and only lost the 1 extra game so far.Originally Posted by Gray77;804648[B
If you are expecting the same dominance for 3 seasons on the trot with a team past its best that's a big ask.
We didn't have the WCC to contend with in either year and I don't think anyone can argue Wigan are not significantly stronger than last year. Also worth pointing out that we aren't out of the play-offs yet and I certainly wouldn't swap our squad or coach for wigan's. We have as good a chance as anyone, if not better, of ending up as champions.
Also worth remembering the dominant 2018 Saints team watched Wire win the CC and Wigan win the GF.
One could make an argument for the 2019 win owing a chunk to Wire (who beat us soundly at Wembley) somehow getting dumped out of the play-offs by Cas such that we had a final vs Salford.
Friday wasn't great by any stretch but we have been coasting for a long time now and it might just have been the intense, nasty-ish game we needed to start the run-in towards retaining the title.
What has amused me (in a frustrated kind of way) slightly more than the normal positivity of any new signing is that they're primarily all forwards. Now we might need forwards you decide and you may also think that our development & succession plans are robust in the areas covering the back line. For me it simply reinforces the fact that he doesn't have a single clue or interest in the whole of the back line. You might suggest I'm picking fault again but can anyone show me any credible reference or even a comment he's ever made about the back line plans or game play or direction of travel? This at a time when we're void of ideas & incapable of putting on a single set play save for another inside pass with no controlling influence in the middle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with this and Stiddy’s point above as well. Of course we’ve fallen back into the pack and there was no way we were going to win the league by 16 points, because that only happened last year because the rest of the teams gave up trying to catch us really. I also agree that playing Salford in the GF aided us massively, I don’t disagree, and yes, our record in big knock games against teams beginning with W is horrendous and has been for years, no doubt.
But I’m not really arguing about that, I’m arguing for the fact that we don’t look as good of a team this season. Loads of reasons can be used for this, like injuries, the lockdown, no fans, etc. All valid, but everyone else has had those problems so I’m not sure why we should get to use it as a reason for our (IMO) quite significant dip in performance and style in 2020. We were not right before the lockdown, we seemed to be fitter and better prepared for the restart and really reaped the rewards in August, then we’ve gone back to where we were pre lockdown really.
Wigan and Wire are better than they were last season in terms of week to week consistency, but nobody else is really pulling up trees, and to be fair neither of those two have really been great at any stage either. Our record is decent, it’s nothing to worry about in isolation, and yes, I agree with posters that say we have a decent chance of winning the GF, and I hope I’ve made the point several times on here that my issue isn’t results and our chances of silverware because I don’t worry about either of those things too much.
But the reason I don’t worry about them because I believe we have the best team, so I’m looking at this from the point of view that we have the best team but we’re only really ‘decent’. We have a decent record, we have a decent chance, etc. The last two seasons we’ve been way above decent, and whilst we messed up some big games we had journeys to those big games that revitalised the club and the fanbase. It became fun again after the missed years of KC, and 2020 has felt like 2018 and 2019 were the exception and not the norm in terms of the enjoyment we all got from watching us play. 2020 was always going to end up strange and a lot less fun because of the situation, but I don’t think Woolf would have done much differently if we’d had crowds and the season had already finished. We’d have been decent, we may have won a GF, but as a journey from A-Z it would have been far below what we would have hoped for.
As I’ve said before, am I taken with Woolf? Not at all. Can we win a GF under him? Definitely. For some only the second question counts, and that’s fair enough. But when we have the best team and had a coach that we were all taken with, I’m not sure it’s asking too much for the answers of both questions to be positive.