Take up the baton, there are enough posters on here alone who have an excellent grasp of language, law and not too little common sense that I am sure would lend their weight.
Ours is a simple game, we are only asking for consistency and transparency across the board. (Especially disciplinary)
Any new rule should super-cede two or three others, going back to basics may be the answer.
Never been my strong point I'll admit.
But you have got me thinking all the same and I do think boycotting/protesting has it's place however I think this needs to be backed up with a solid argument of what we like to improve and achieve. That said, why would the RFL listen when they answer to no one? They need to be hit in the pocket or feel as though their position is under threat, or both.