Jungle Out There Banner
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 160

Thread: Interesting disciplinary this week......

  1. #101
    In The North Stand With All The Old Folk Buddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    10,887
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dux View Post
    Yeah, I'm sure you're right. I'm just a bit surprised that the tackle itself only seems to have merited one match in the eyes of the disciplinary.
    Isn't Paul Cullen the head of the disciplinary committee?
    He probably doesn't see an offence!

    Sent from my SM-A716B using Tapatalk

  2. #102
    In The South Stand Sean Day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,345
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    The tackle itself should have been 2 games minimum. Iím not sure how it could have been worse - swinging arm, clenched fist, forceful direct contact with the head

  3. #103
    In The West Stand Belgian Saint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    7,486
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SaintJon View Post
    There should also be repercussions for Kendall and Hicks, how they never followed up on the McIlorum incident I'll never know.
    Although you are right, we know that won't happen. One of them will probably be given the GF.

  4. #104
    Got A Replica Shirt
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    62
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    The tackle itself should have been 2 games minimum. Iím not sure how it could have been worse - swinging arm, clenched fist, forceful direct contact with the head
    The minutes of the MRP say that the ball carrier was dipping !!

    MRP Minutes

  5. #105
    Moderator Div's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sintellins
    Posts
    11,336
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buddy View Post
    Isn't Paul Cullen the head of the disciplinary committee?
    He probably doesn't see an offence!

    Sent from my SM-A716B using Tapatalk
    I think Phil Veivers is one of the committee.

  6. #106
    Learning All The Songs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,271
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Think Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be linked to a number of games and he should be looking at a ban based upon months. Let’s be honest, we’ve seen a few incidents this year, probably more than most years that could be deemed sexual assault and I don’t think we’ve really come down hard enough on anyone as a sport and I include Makinson in that bracket too.
    St Helens Rugby League Football Club

  7. #107
    Got A Replica Shirt
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    62
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Div View Post
    I think Phil Veivers is one of the committee.
    "The current members of the Match Review Panel are Paul Cullen, Paul Dixon, Phil Veivers and Nathan McAvoy."

    Link

  8. #108
    In The West Stand Belgian Saint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    7,486
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel City Saint View Post
    The minutes of the MRP say that the ball carrier was dipping !!

    MRP Minutes
    I would dip as well, AFTER I had been hit by Tomkins fist.

  9. #109
    Learning All The Songs RJM25R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Royton, Oldham
    Posts
    1,524
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belgian Saint View Post
    I would dip as well, AFTER I had been hit by Tomkins fist.
    If Tomkins fist was involved I donít think Myler would have been walking.....

    I think you meant McIlorum
    Can't stop the spirits when they need you.

    This life is more than just a read through.

  10. #110
    Starting A Programme Collection
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    571
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belgian Saint View Post
    I would dip as well, AFTER I had been hit by Tomkins fist.
    I think that would need to be on an x-rated site rather than Sky Sports

  11. #111
    In The West Stand Belgian Saint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    7,486
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RJM25R View Post
    If Tomkins fist was involved I don’t think Myler would have been walking.....

    I think you meant McIlorum
    You are right, I di mean McIllorum.

  12. #112
    In The South Stand warringtonsaint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,768
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dos Cervezas View Post
    Think Tomkins’ ban shouldn’t be linked to a number of games and he should be looking at a ban based upon months. Let’s be honest, we’ve seen a few incidents this year, probably more than most years that could be deemed sexual assault and I don’t think we’ve really come down hard enough on anyone as a sport and I include Makinson in that bracket too.
    You mean like Flower's was??????
    "The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom." Danny Blanchflower.
    Might have been written by a footballer about football - but never a truer word............

  13. #113
    In The South Stand STIDDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Kingdom of Wigoon
    Posts
    4,918
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dos Cervezas View Post
    Think Tomkinsí ban shouldnít be linked to a number of games and he should be looking at a ban based upon months. Letís be honest, weíve seen a few incidents this year, probably more than most years that could be deemed sexual assault and I donít think weíve really come down hard enough on anyone as a sport and I include Makinson in that bracket too.
    With Covid still around it would be wise to stay with the "games ban" if he gets a 4 month ban for instance he might only miss a couple of games. Makinson and Lineham had to endure their long game bans I think Tomkins should be treated the same way for consistency.

    However if we have a player guilty of severe GBH play and the injured player is out for the season then the offender should be banned for the season in that circumstance.

  14. #114
    Moderator Div's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sintellins
    Posts
    11,336
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Micky Mac - 6 match ban
    2 for the high shot and 4 for the other offence which was downgraded.

  15. #115
    Got A Season Ticket
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    487
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Div View Post
    Micky Mac - 6 match ban
    2 for the high shot and 4 for the other offence which was downgraded.
    Any news on tomkins?

  16. #116
    In The South Stand Jackbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    2,543
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    1 down, one to go. And Kendall and Hicks didn't see owt, cowboys.

  17. #117
    In The South Stand Sean Day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,345
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Did the high tackle get upgraded from 1 to 2 games?

  18. #118
    Moderator Div's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sintellins
    Posts
    11,336
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by itswide2west View Post
    Any news on tomkins?
    Not yet.
    They need to get their finger out..... So to speak.

  19. #119
    Moderator Div's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sintellins
    Posts
    11,336
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Did the high tackle get upgraded from 1 to 2 games?
    Seems to have been.

  20. #120
    In The South Stand Jackbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    2,543
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Did the high tackle get upgraded from 1 to 2 games?
    He challenged the B grading. But the panel upheld it and give him a £500 fine to boot.

  21. #121
    Got A Season Ticket
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    390
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Did the high tackle get upgraded from 1 to 2 games?
    It seems so as the original recommendation was 1 game ban. It may be that an extra game was a consequence of objecting to the grading. The RFL post doesn't make it clear. Just Joel Tompkins to come

    Sent from my PRA-LX1 using Tapatalk

  22. #122
    Learning All The Songs
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Newport, Shropshire
    Posts
    1,713
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackbit View Post
    1 down, one to go. And Kendall and Hicks didn't see owt, cowboys.
    What I donít get is that the pulling an injured player upwards, even downgraded, merits a 4 match ban and yet Kendall, who witnessed it, didnít deem it worthy of a penalty or a card. Will anyone bother to ask him what he was thinking?

  23. #123
    In The South Stand Jackbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    2,543
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suttoner View Post
    What I don’t get is that the pulling an injured player upwards, even downgraded, merits a 4 match ban and yet Kendall, who witnessed it, didn’t deem it worthy of a penalty or a card. Will anyone bother to ask him what he was thinking?
    I've said it before, we are going backwards in this area. They have a tough job but some of the stuff going on is embarrassing to the game and a danger to the players at times.

  24. #124
    In The West Stand The Wee Waa Womble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Harrogate
    Age
    30
    Posts
    5,360
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Did the high tackle get upgraded from 1 to 2 games?
    Players can challenge a Penalty Notice (A-C) Ė in which case the matter will be determined by the Operational Rules Tribunal. A refundable deposit of £500 for Super League players and £250 for all other players must be lodged when submitting a challenge. If challenge is successful, the deposit shall be returned. Challenges to a Penalty Notice can only be made on the following grounds:
    - Guilt
    - Improper Grading of the Offence by the Panel

    Unsuccessful challenges will result in a one-match increase in sanction where grounds for challenge considered unreasonable. If player is found not guilty then no sanction will be handed out. A successful grading challenge will lead to a sanction that would have been imposed for the revised Grade.

    Basically they challenged the high tackle charge and it was considered unreasonable, so an extra game automatically gets added on.
    Forwards win games. The backs decide by how much.

  25. #125
    In The West Stand Belgian Saint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    7,486
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suttoner View Post
    What I don’t get is that the pulling an injured player upwards, even downgraded, merits a 4 match ban and yet Kendall, who witnessed it, didn’t deem it worthy of a penalty or a card. Will anyone bother to ask him what he was thinking?
    Of course not. Though behind closed doors he may get shown the video and asked to explain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •