Chapel House Motor Company Limited Advertising Banner
Results 1 to 25 of 45

Thread: Disciplinary

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Starting A Programme Collection
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    St helens
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Disciplinary

    Has anybody been on disciplinary page .. sure clubb no charge , dont know if I read it right. Farge charged. Don’t know what for,,, anybody know ..

  2. #2
    Got A Season Ticket Lord Lucan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Winstanley
    Posts
    172
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    [QUOTE=mr chips;777028]Has anybody been on disciplinary page .. sure clubb no charge , dont know if I read it right. Farge charged. Don’t know what for,,, anybody know ..[/

    RANGE OF RECOMMENDED SANCTIONS IN RELATION TO CHARGED GRADE* :

    0 Match Penalty Notice

    DETAILS OF CHARGE / REASON FOR NF :

    Rule – 15.1(d) Detail – Lifts opponent into Dangerous Position Grade – A

    DECISION:

    Charge

    INCIDENT:

    Dangerous Throw in the 53rd minute (Hardaker)

  3. #3
    Starting A Programme Collection
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    St helens
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Don’t think anyone saw this. Everybody deff saw clubb. What the f—k is wrong with the bent disciplinary. They are going to try everything to stop saints complete •••••••s..

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4,739
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr chips View Post
    Don’t think anyone saw this. Everybody deff saw clubb. What the f—k is wrong with the bent disciplinary. They are going to try everything to stop saints complete •••••••s..
    Fages didn't get banned and Clubb certainly didn't deserve a ban. In fact after the way he played I hope he's the first name on the team sheet against Salford. The disciplinary have got it right.

  5. #5
    In The South Stand Sean Day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,672
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angry Dave View Post
    Fages didn't get banned and Clubb certainly didn't deserve a ban. In fact after the way he played I hope he's the first name on the team sheet against Salford. The disciplinary have got it right.
    Agreed. I think Clubb’s was a bit naughty in terms of how late/reckless it was and I think he should have been binned, but not worth a ban really

  6. #6
    Got A Season Ticket
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    430
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I only have access on my phone at the moment and can’t make head nor tail of the RFL disciplinary page from there. Has Theo actually been charged and at risk of a ban?

    Thanks.

  7. #7
    Learning All The Songs
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,130
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Agreed. I think Clubb’s was a bit naughty in terms of how late/reckless it was and I think he should have been binned, but not worth a ban really
    I didn't think Arron Smith deserved a 2 game ban before Wembley but the inconsistencies are glaringly obvious.

  8. #8
    In The South Stand Greengrass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Queens Arms dreading the King coming home early.
    Posts
    4,377
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Day View Post
    Agreed. I think Clubb’s was a bit naughty in terms of how late/reckless it was and I think he should have been binned, but not worth a ban really
    Taia got banned for a similar tackle a couple of years ago so the inconsistency is consistent.
    On the Back foot looking for the front one.

  9. #9
    In The North Stand With All The Old Folk STIDDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Kingdom of Wigoon
    Posts
    8,871
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr chips View Post
    Don’t think anyone saw this. Everybody deff saw clubb. What the f—k is wrong with the bent disciplinary. They are going to try everything to stop saints complete •••••••s..
    I remember Fages lifted someone and dumped him on his back, didn't realise it was Hardaker though, just thought it was a little bloke doing a dominant tackle on a big bloke at the time.

  10. #10
    In The South Stand 49er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    4,221
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    [QUOTE=Lord Lucan;777029]
    Quote Originally Posted by mr chips View Post
    Has anybody been on disciplinary page .. sure clubb no charge , dont know if I read it right. Farge charged. Don’t know what for,,, anybody know ..[/

    RANGE OF RECOMMENDED SANCTIONS IN RELATION TO CHARGED GRADE* :

    0 Match Penalty Notice

    DETAILS OF CHARGE / REASON FOR NF :

    Rule – 15.1(d) Detail – Lifts opponent into Dangerous Position Grade – A

    DECISION:

    Charge

    INCIDENT:

    Dangerous Throw in the 53rd minute (Hardaker)
    Where is the link for this as I can’t find it on RFL site.
    Humans are more concerned with having than being.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •