Originally Posted by
Prez
Couple of points pal. Firstly, please don't make assumptions that because people object to outright thuggery on a sports pitch they have "lived a sheltered life". I haven't lived a sheltered life and if you knew me you would chose your phraseology more carefully. I suppose in the age of the keyboard warrior this is acceptable. Ah, those who chew nails and spit out battleships, bless 'em, how tough they are. I love the fact that you've seen bigger fights over the shops, must make you live in a tough area, one mean hombre, hey, gee what a guy. Any chance you could sort out Syria on your own? Secondly, I've just watched the Super League Show and Hill can clearly be seen punching a prone player, which isn't the punching incident you cite, which is the Tompkins incident. Finally (I know I said a couple of points and this is a third, but hey, you're tough, you'll forgive me, you've probably just fought your way back form the shops,), I'm not bothered who turns out against Saints (although having seen the Warrington 19, one wonders if the club itself is taking the incident more seriously as half the first team appear to be missing), I want player to be banned for being thugs and for it to impact their season, not because they pose a threat to us (they don't). Okay, so there you go, I'll run back to hide behind the sofa.